Inicio Novedades Casos y Estudios Recepción de casos Contactos
Septiembre 2015
ONG denuncia en Bruselas violaciones de derechos humanos en Latinoamérica
Informe sobre el derecho a la libertad de asociación y reuníon en Bolivia, Ecuador y Nicaragua
“The World Bank is a Human Rights-Free Zone” – UN expert on extreme poverty expresses deep concern
Archivan proceso para disolver ONG de sector de la comunicación en Ecuador
“A la Secom le compete controlar Fundamedios”
¿Cuánto de pueblo tiene Fundamedios?
Ecuador: Relatores de ONU y la CIDH condenan medidas para disolver a una destacada organización
Ecuador / Libertad de expresión: Relatores de ONU y la CIDH condenan medidas para disolver a una destacada organización
El desafío indígena en Ecuador
Día Internacional de la Democracia: Espacio para la sociedad civil
Por el Día Internacional de la Democracia
ONG de comunicación de Ecuador se declara en resistencia ante su disolución
Demandan ONG el cumplimiento pleno a recomendaciones del GIEI
Cumplir las observaciones de la CIDH, piden ONG a Peña
ONGs contra Venezuela
Organizaciones venezolanas de DDHH rechazan la orden del gobierno ecuatoriano de disolver Fundación Andina para la Observación Social y el Estudio de Medios (Fundamendios)
Fundamedios revela que la Secom le notificó que se inició su disolución
“The World Bank is a Human Rights-Free Zone” – UN expert on extreme poverty expresses deep concern
Fecha: 25 de septiembre de 2015

GENEVA (29 September 2015) – The United Nations Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights, Philip Alston, has called on the World Bank and its member States to adopt a new and consistent approach to human rights.

“For most purposes, the World Bank is currently a human rights-free zone. In its operational policies, in particular, it treats human rights more like an infectious disease than universal values and obligations,” Alston says in a new report* published online on the approach to human rights by the World Bank, the most important international actor on poverty alleviation.

The report, which will be officially presented to the UN General Assembly on 23 October, explains that the biggest single obstacle to better integrate human rights into the work of the World Bank is “the anachronistic and inconsistent interpretation of the ‘political prohibition’ contained in the Bank’s Articles of Agreement.”

“They invoke the Articles of Agreement, which were adopted in 1945, and argue that this clause not to interfere in States’ political affairs effectively prohibits the Bank from engaging with issues of human rights,” the expert says.

However, he stresses, “these Articles were written more than 70 years ago, when there was no international catalogue of human rights, no specific treaty obligations upon States, and not a single international institution addressing these issues.”

In his report, Alston notes that –despite their legal arguments– the World Bank’s real reason to avoid dealing with human rights is clearly political.

“Western countries, cheered on by Western civil society, have often pushed the Bank to sanction developing countries with a poor human rights record by delaying or withholding development loans to those countries. Countries that borrow money from the Bank, or member states that are critical of human rights, don’t want the World Bank to turn into a ‘human rights cop’ that meddles in their internal affairs,” he explains.

For the Special Rapporteur, all these approaches are misguided. “World Bank member States from all parts of the world are to blame,” he says.

“The use of the human rights framework makes an enormous difference, which is exactly why the Bank is so resistant to using it,” the expert notes, stressing that human rights invoke the legal obligations that States have agreed upon and brings a degree of normative certainty. “Even more importantly, the language of rights recognizes the dignity and agency of all individuals.”

“It is striking how little thought has been given to what a World Bank human rights policy might look like in practice. It is now time for World Bank President Jim Yong Kim to take the initiative”, Alston says in his report. “But World Bank member states also have a responsibility: they should begin to grapple seriously with what a World Bank human rights policy should look like, and they should start doing that today!”

The UN Special Rapporteur will spend the next few weeks talking to the World Bank and its member states about his recommendations, before the official presentation of his report to the UN General Assembly in New York.

(*) Read the full report:




Casos y Estudios
Marco legal y normativo
Recepción de casos